Hey there Inkstoners! It’s Juliana here. Journalism is a tough, but fun and interesting profession. For one, you get to go out there and meet lots of people, some of whom really make you go hmmm. Two years ago, a PR agency pitched me a story. Hong Kong property billionaire Lui Che Woo was starting an Asian version of the Nobel Prize. Winners get a cash prize of $2.5 million each, and that’s a lot more than the Nobel Prize cash awards. The categories: 1) sustainability prize 2) welfare betterment prize 3) positive energy prize. Yes, Mr Lui was giving $2.5 million to someone who was promoting “positive energy.” That being the inaugural year, there was no track record of winners. Who were the contenders? Yoga teachers? Reiki instructors? No way, I thought. The winner in the first year turned out to be former US President Jimmy Carter, who undoubtedly has lots of good karma from years of human rights activism. But the phrase “positive energy” isn’t just a New Age thing. In fact, the Chinese catch phrase was co-opted by President Xi Jinping in 2012 during a meeting with...Jimmy Carter. Since then, it’s often been used by officialdom to describe nearly anything in line with their policies or ideology. By contrast, “negative energy” is used to describe views not in line with official views. The “positive” versus “negative” energy debate has been trending on Chinese social media this week. A top pro-government journalist and critic has slammed an acclaimed Chinese auteur’s latest gritty gangster drama, calling it “stinky tofu” for its “negative energy” and drawing the ire of many online commentators. Check out our fourth story today for all the details |
No comments:
Post a Comment